{"id":"W4378982888","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2023.102322","title":"Culturally responsive evaluation: A scoping review of the evaluation literature","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Evaluation and Program Planning","topic":"Evaluation and Performance Assessment","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; NOSM University; Lakehead University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Participatory evaluation; Situated; Culturally appropriate; Citizen journalism; Culturally sensitive; Evaluation methods; Psychology; Community-based participatory research; Program evaluation; Participatory action research; Applied psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Sociology; Social psychology; Engineering; Political science; Computer science; Gerontology; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.09043532,0.0005356642,0.001666362,0.0006104073,0.0005095017,0.0006479509,0.0009099178,0.0003639943,0.001689968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03079547,0.0002999917,0.0006264037,0.004504616,0.0001400654,0.0005861364,0.0002896917,0.0006287816,0.0001459594],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003087042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00574218,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002479724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001428214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9722792,0.0108366,0.003053494,0.001087931,0.01235892,0.0003838416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845852,0.002834366,0.003126643,0.001202823,0.008123103,0.0001278927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007032143,0.00002364542,0.00001967669,0.02578307,0.00007906948,5.248754e-7,0.0008478627,0.0001200272,1.501912e-7,0.00005188848,0.003011065,0.970056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005663059,0.0001106023,0.0003054162,0.7250091,0.002619983,0.00003296198,0.0002825902,0.02152628,6.584444e-7,0.00109445,0.2480706,0.0003810554],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003581348,0.9771755,0.00001205856,0.0006761169,0.00103668,0.018149,0.00004068037,0.00007358861,0.002800565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000372756,0.9931805,0.0004402724,0.0003198845,0.0002418924,0.004481054,0.0007538451,0.0000385778,0.0005067245],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696749,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999452,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.599779829732056,"score_gpt":0.675526932126798,"score_spread":0.07574710239474203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}