{"id":"W4379137501","doi":"10.1007/s11367-023-02185-7","title":"Resource efficiency analysis through planetary boundary-based life cycle assessment: a case study of sugarcane in Pakistan","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment","topic":"Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research and Innovation, Thailand; King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Boundary (topology); Life-cycle assessment; Planetary boundaries; Environmental science; Resource efficiency; Environmental resource management; Agricultural engineering; Engineering; Computer science; Biology; Mathematics; Economics; Ecology; Sustainability; Production (economics); Microeconomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001395484,0.0004403298,0.0004964645,0.001678396,0.001393758,0.001869406,0.0009534,0.000865397,0.00153968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002531952,0.0002225383,0.0006045569,0.002828682,0.0007640484,0.001393929,0.0006519557,0.0005742958,0.00009453768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005575852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004057898,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2412201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2676263,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994006,0.0002024105,0.00002453103,0.00006918169,0.0001421277,0.0001611469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983453,0.000999158,0.000119421,0.00006242839,0.0003933122,0.00008043193],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003571527,0.0005369239,0.1127463,0.0002960175,0.0002335749,0.003557028,0.001705363,0.789114,0.003946535,0.01099502,0.001609723,0.07490237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003045528,0.0002287802,0.05129774,0.00005770133,0.0001228392,0.0001897548,0.007922256,0.9296992,0.003700965,0.004199003,0.002483034,0.00006821975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884273,0.0001076293,0.005511078,0.0001747389,0.00000384369,0.0001013717,0.0003678236,0.00003072394,0.005275481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965953,0.00006890098,0.00284744,0.000005974623,0.000001000817,0.00001189149,0.0001205323,0.000005365632,0.0003435305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2412201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4796321,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01389310747142196,"score_gpt":0.3328024682387076,"score_spread":0.3189093607672856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}