{"id":"W4379616642","doi":"10.1353/hms.2003.a383341","title":"Philo's Argument for Divine Amorality Reconsidered","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Teleological argument; Epicureanism; Judgement; Skepticism; Soul; Dialectic; Theology; Teleology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006215623,0.0004153348,0.0004354435,0.001164892,0.009519239,0.006592366,0.001298556,0.008331227,0.009436432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009457493,0.0003921018,0.0005641263,0.0007466496,0.04728162,0.007519807,0.004306909,0.006461974,0.001165588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005272258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002781491,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002875752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003236588,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936858,0.004428647,0.0001036404,0.0005473857,0.0008226822,0.000411837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941597,0.004174179,0.0003105467,0.0005908831,0.0005043243,0.0002604972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006262411,0.000004692803,0.00004901013,0.00001304956,0.000001053202,0.00002066796,0.001423212,0.00005098342,0.00001436205,0.9940263,0.003130296,0.001260011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005833284,0.00004255948,0.0002335852,0.0001602691,0.000007315089,0.0001665661,0.002040115,0.0003162841,0.0002281851,0.7285575,0.2681761,0.00001317754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02060651,0.007795489,0.01477538,0.1432931,0.0006172081,0.00004864292,0.00005665897,0.00005518182,0.8127519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.872456,0.002085211,0.004145985,0.01886512,0.0009480254,0.0002022125,0.00003161513,0.00009800037,0.101168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009519239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03825307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2563155828018547,"score_gpt":0.3323026121832888,"score_spread":0.07598702938143409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}