{"id":"W4379616642","doi":"10.1353/hms.2003.a383341","title":"Philo's Argument for Divine Amorality Reconsidered","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hume studies","topic":"Theology and Philosophy of Evil","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Teleological argument; Epicureanism; Judgement; Skepticism; Soul; Dialectic; Theology; Teleology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002855111,0.0001393346,0.0002650266,0.0000328687,0.0006114196,0.00002618278,0.00006574978,0.00002633883,0.001426535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001732259,0.0001096232,0.0001032959,0.00001081372,0.0004955642,0.0000835398,0.00002510614,0.00006488813,0.00007704351],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000156942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001089563,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008305147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003014494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992816,0.00006308075,0.0001947958,0.0001910146,0.00006063364,0.0002088183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993843,0.0002301413,0.00006966394,0.0001614513,0.0001250635,0.00002939327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002363033,0.00005768417,0.0002769657,0.00004475641,0.000246675,0.000001321563,0.009703485,3.647482e-7,0.000004754967,0.9592954,0.02998552,0.0003594802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003450825,0.0001058504,0.0001021894,0.0000149729,0.00004519393,0.000001169117,0.001848516,4.045261e-7,0.0001027434,0.5269575,0.4703542,0.0001221912],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1654706,0.02308645,0.00005435478,0.02170276,0.005475093,0.001235312,0.0002108654,0.0003296655,0.7824349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855862,0.0001032677,0.0001697499,0.0008291285,0.0005289384,0.00009311239,0.000005347616,0.0000104729,0.01267375],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8201157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994863,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2563155828018547,"score_gpt":0.3323026121832888,"score_spread":0.07598702938143409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}