{"id":"W4379650141","doi":"10.1108/sampj-11-2022-0605","title":"Are ESG performance-based incentives a panacea or a smokescreen for excess compensation?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Corporate governance; Executive compensation; Corporate social responsibility; Business; Panacea (medicine); Shareholder; Accounting; Public economics; Economics; Public relations; Microeconomics; Finance; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003824074,0.000355449,0.0004530468,0.001401891,0.001676978,0.001624789,0.0004064503,0.0001102315,0.00003964166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004529447,0.0003154054,0.0002088041,0.002453157,0.0002258295,0.001869038,0.0004940768,0.0003092012,0.00001552715],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004570493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003272782,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002482812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001325912,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970088,0.00006093796,0.0008772776,0.0005383863,0.000565779,0.0009487931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963908,0.0004040018,0.001519754,0.0003599883,0.00127101,0.00005451235],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009458795,0.00011775,0.9066648,0.004053591,0.0001073968,0.0001096855,0.0002471667,0.0006745854,0.000004113385,0.00836769,0.002020264,0.07668708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002207381,0.00004393893,0.8527912,0.0002278763,0.0001807278,0.000011487,0.01314847,0.01731518,0.000005985474,0.05221397,0.06127087,0.0005828746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885506,0.00002467697,0.001438557,0.006374174,0.0002226017,0.001520377,0.000003851458,0.0003267211,0.001538434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943821,0.00002551858,0.00020055,0.001343022,0.001907185,0.0001122817,0.0000221494,0.00005450662,0.001952733],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07610421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999298,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04282843196286029,"score_gpt":0.3153731854162063,"score_spread":0.2725447534533461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}