{"id":"W4381094670","doi":"10.1007/s13753-023-00496-9","title":"Human–Animal Interactions in Disaster Settings: A Systematic Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Disaster Risk Science","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Terminology; Multidisciplinary approach; Grey literature; Systematic review; Inclusion (mineral); Disaster research; Natural disaster; Animal welfare; Medicine; MEDLINE; Psychology; Political science; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001809164,0.0003740297,0.001396509,0.000742034,0.000119973,0.0002279562,0.001822675,0.00007554897,0.00005178919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002019236,0.000275291,0.0007109392,0.0004899141,0.000293083,0.00008094506,0.0006704552,0.0006105544,0.0001751285],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002728232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002979576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001182683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000844448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958531,0.0003017403,0.002090432,0.0004835207,0.0009662172,0.0003050139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959131,0.0001251091,0.002624336,0.000380717,0.0008406907,0.0001159906],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002002426,0.001524584,0.0004306621,0.8980948,0.008294164,0.000884801,0.004132074,0.00003211032,0.003060652,0.0004450917,0.03569836,0.04720248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000359382,0.0003076233,0.00005562631,0.7597199,0.001404217,0.001399054,0.0009892022,0.00000857437,0.00002888902,0.00004045622,0.2350831,0.0006038995],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001088659,0.9959489,0.00004894609,0.0001198383,0.001508096,0.0006362203,0.00007893428,0.00001025662,0.0005601949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00345418,0.9945788,0.00007773299,0.0002130792,0.0005740489,0.00007999127,0.00001830118,0.00004541682,0.0009584298],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1993848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05807023255721357,"score_gpt":0.4686238398193407,"score_spread":0.4105536072621272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}