{"id":"W4381094670","doi":"10.1007/s13753-023-00496-9","title":"Human–Animal Interactions in Disaster Settings: A Systematic Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Disaster Risk Science","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University; Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Terminology; Multidisciplinary approach; Grey literature; Systematic review; Inclusion (mineral); Disaster research; Natural disaster; Animal welfare; Medicine; MEDLINE; Psychology; Political science; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01217166,0.001627269,0.007778736,0.01056715,0.0008686152,0.003329735,0.002015933,0.002402387,0.005668486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05152575,0.001386326,0.007044955,0.01229352,0.0009671196,0.003452165,0.001946969,0.001403891,0.0004234542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004672736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01840868,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009149629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02962532,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9904339,0.003794966,0.002943164,0.0006733424,0.00177554,0.0003790539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607244,0.02960153,0.005110603,0.0004870478,0.003646602,0.0004299155],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001018352,0.00001534701,0.0005342547,0.9655036,0.004977639,0.0001105741,0.0002135369,0.00006897273,0.00007958626,0.0001877629,0.001234796,0.02697214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001465472,0.0001925619,0.003498582,0.9326999,0.04358212,0.0003920578,0.0006075894,0.00006679061,0.0001396889,0.000259403,0.01837902,0.00003572423],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007469163,0.9979831,0.0001422638,0.0002434642,0.0001195487,0.0003247231,0.0002081366,0.000005274835,0.0002265744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01121038,0.98691,0.0005527506,0.0003812139,0.00006653585,0.0006460013,0.0001326744,0.000003019472,0.00009739684],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01217166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06437063,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05807023255721357,"score_gpt":0.4686238398193407,"score_spread":0.4105536072621272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}