{"id":"W4382984598","doi":"10.3389/fevo.2023.1179158","title":"Comparative efficacy of eDNA and conventional methods for monitoring wetland anuran communities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines; University of Toronto; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Wetland; Biodiversity; Species richness; Amphibian; Sampling (signal processing); Chytridiomycosis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004865152,0.0007330732,0.000367503,0.001630865,0.0004788654,0.0007476698,0.0007943996,0.0005383439,0.0005829172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00761262,0.0004248196,0.0002396978,0.0005882223,0.001350536,0.0009952015,0.001160622,0.0003864801,0.0001651302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001350753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007686869,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01523527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1080711,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952936,0.001135376,0.0002745636,0.001352126,0.001764408,0.0001799389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928033,0.002484748,0.001673854,0.0004201266,0.002249315,0.0003687237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008096641,0.0002389631,0.6039735,0.001194066,0.000355812,0.0001236517,0.002270238,0.001752622,0.2746512,0.0004032478,0.0001519455,0.1140752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003917846,0.002349745,0.9119837,0.0001868282,0.0002857799,0.0003942198,0.001124424,0.005110083,0.07526124,0.0002425568,0.00291072,0.0001116093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789761,0.001729317,0.01588777,0.00005733518,0.00001946865,0.0001885948,0.0003749149,0.00005154296,0.002715033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9443061,0.001241095,0.0525603,0.00009169414,0.0000176505,0.0001647931,0.0004772138,0.00001302478,0.001128226],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01523527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03029317,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03108870593249569,"score_gpt":0.301506578544619,"score_spread":0.2704178726121234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}