{"id":"W4383040765","doi":"10.1142/s0219024923500115","title":"BEATING A CONSTANT WEIGHT BENCHMARK: EASIER DONE THAN SAID","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance","topic":"Stochastic processes and financial applications","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Constant (computer programming); Benchmark (surveying); Mathematical economics; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Econometrics; Geology; Geodesy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004436683,0.0001214706,0.0002997326,0.0001772307,0.00008670662,0.00006518009,0.0003631639,0.00007390035,0.00009841591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001593873,0.0001134807,0.00009075954,0.000255057,0.0003073822,0.00009385501,0.0001121442,0.0001987595,0.000120742],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003938971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002812313,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005545005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.511945e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988204,0.000002684478,0.0006449829,0.0002150139,0.0001099102,0.0002070203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991356,0.0001434274,0.0004338402,0.00010496,0.0001116686,0.00007057349],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007210523,0.00004588564,0.0006606533,0.000006582534,0.00003941804,0.00001192134,0.0001288048,0.00002296251,0.0001182868,0.9928333,0.0002648695,0.005795229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005714428,0.00004639267,0.005886178,0.00004755177,0.000006887501,0.0000496791,0.00004517999,0.0008049209,0.0001918895,0.9802507,0.01195044,0.0001487093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3984489,0.00202054,0.5058586,0.01258089,0.001507779,0.0003052584,0.0003623421,0.00006484815,0.0788509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953914,0.0005499923,0.003282341,0.0002590233,0.0003783276,0.0000171331,0.000007710017,0.00001302358,0.0001010568],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5969425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.462761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01098431158575371,"score_gpt":0.225802948957968,"score_spread":0.2148186373722143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}