{"id":"W4383301699","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.16208","title":"Demographic and reproductive impacts of hybridization unrelated to hybrid viability in a native plant","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Botany","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Hybrid; Malus; Introgression; Botany; Population; Ploidy; Endosperm; Pollination; Reproductive isolation; Reproductive biology; Gene flow; Embryo; Zoology; Pollen; Genetics; Genetic variation; Gene; Embryogenesis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005731567,0.00006906693,0.0002492655,0.00004953568,0.00004255961,0.000007648639,0.00007093704,0.000009255878,0.000004130915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003959305,0.00002757611,0.00004223616,0.001039522,0.0001167959,0.00007147769,0.00003626044,0.00008430116,0.000001012238],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001578919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006970286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001832287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004715189,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992488,0.00009309853,0.0002552583,0.000128121,0.0001402086,0.0001345089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993142,0.0002557827,0.0002450106,0.00001383509,0.0001044419,0.0000667581],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005999865,0.00008190832,0.6301182,0.000005228159,0.00006750265,0.00006118104,0.0008645541,0.00001628187,0.3264122,0.00001736219,0.000300842,0.0414548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008241338,0.001440518,0.9931017,0.00005389736,0.000007976093,0.0000426769,0.001302986,0.00002694311,0.003449207,0.0002975074,0.000130661,0.00006354358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986824,0.0001581889,0.000001441864,0.0009829765,0.00002075043,0.00007568549,0.00004778158,0.00000771957,0.00002308329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995443,0.0003376966,0.00003055158,0.00003790105,0.0000434013,9.239995e-7,0.000001452865,4.875183e-7,0.00000333028],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3629835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1124521,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01781667130366108,"score_gpt":0.2240347514183196,"score_spread":0.2062180801146585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}