{"id":"W4384282546","doi":"10.2308/horizons-2020-207","title":"Do Gender-Diverse Boards Enhance the Linguistic Features of Corporate Financial Reporting?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Horizons","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Readability; Accounting; Tone (literature); Gender diversity; Corporate governance; Audit; Business; Transparency (behavior); Representation (politics); Quality (philosophy); Diversity (politics); Sample (material); Narrative; Political science; Finance; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002463226,0.00009768493,0.0001023551,0.0006442355,0.0003803221,0.001179148,0.0001642965,0.0002466758,0.004793108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01823792,0.00008590386,0.0001077308,0.0003776856,0.0004744869,0.000828651,0.0006340538,0.0002129669,0.0003691642],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004118862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004322821,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002316925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005495744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987221,0.0006173092,0.00006934373,0.0001263609,0.0003058419,0.0001590605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876292,0.003840094,0.006196483,0.0004752841,0.0009017932,0.0009571255],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001941859,0.00009289104,0.9310694,0.00005121777,0.00003492848,0.0002087481,0.007917266,0.0001282527,0.002048203,0.001156705,0.001496246,0.05560195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004428997,0.00007255462,0.9904482,0.00004509175,0.00001233424,0.00008469803,0.005133278,0.0001342394,0.0005240638,0.0006905828,0.002843823,0.000006714113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932042,0.0003824178,0.0002759827,0.001049327,0.00003437341,0.000006666254,0.0001192118,0.000003930652,0.004923816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990737,0.00009463198,0.00008337277,0.00009922009,0.00003005561,0.000002896531,0.00002854548,0.000001604365,0.0005859943],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004793108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01603454,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02949658255005808,"score_gpt":0.2601917207958347,"score_spread":0.2306951382457767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}