{"id":"W4384454346","doi":"10.1111/1365-2656.13984","title":"Accounting for behaviour in fine‐scale habitat selection: A case study highlighting methodological intricacies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Animal Ecology","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"Miljøstyrelsen; 15. Juni Fonden","keywords":"Foraging; Selection (genetic algorithm); Habitat; Ecology; Scale (ratio); Population; Terrain; Biology; Geography; Computer science; Cartography; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03100651,0.0006541605,0.0006907182,0.0008709901,0.0009576803,0.001657385,0.001646304,0.001370732,0.0008066992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05993085,0.0003788022,0.002070501,0.001846617,0.001360303,0.001489712,0.002138213,0.001622075,0.0001565347],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001281417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001714056,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02107251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03187691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9848836,0.01245219,0.0006860212,0.001069867,0.0006819034,0.0002264911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9150251,0.0717096,0.003598593,0.006924633,0.002326052,0.0004160434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004678696,0.001049792,0.6659368,0.001093786,0.001623025,0.002660874,0.008405609,0.1231226,0.005970274,0.01579363,0.001354363,0.1725214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001193968,0.001346531,0.2991377,0.001045114,0.0009760282,0.001823076,0.007235846,0.6162209,0.008726814,0.04749757,0.01555606,0.0003148571],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7176071,0.001777219,0.2761919,0.001362845,0.00006511604,0.0003384856,0.0004051343,0.0001282296,0.002123937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8130567,0.0007649036,0.1846702,0.000236457,0.00005096574,0.0003668641,0.000304309,0.00007850231,0.000471008],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03100651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16398,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06199929432878774,"score_gpt":0.3323551643783844,"score_spread":0.2703558700495966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}