{"id":"W4384460075","doi":"10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104534","title":"What citation tests really tell us about bias in academic publishing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Economic Review","topic":"Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Citation; Publishing; Positive economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Publication bias; Economics; Quality (philosophy); Citation impact; Econometrics; Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Philosophy; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1507615,0.0009456957,0.004679155,0.01662471,0.002027789,0.0144392,0.003192073,0.008699636,0.008830324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.64355,0.0007123903,0.002771961,0.02445392,0.01638424,0.03234788,0.003423135,0.006671987,0.001698948],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003770587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004029698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003355365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002838215,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8444925,0.1018585,0.01602747,0.006459954,0.02803186,0.003129764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1932145,0.7127686,0.04169568,0.01764482,0.03236783,0.0023086],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002668259,0.0002553497,0.07606889,0.01903227,0.0116055,0.0003320288,0.005991838,0.00206497,0.0004423148,0.4691683,0.125965,0.2864052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007730878,0.0003606556,0.05218255,0.01232614,0.004259069,0.0003685072,0.003719509,0.001855116,0.001246505,0.8161937,0.1064306,0.0002844633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06414638,0.523447,0.0167075,0.2992233,0.02952055,0.0001568797,0.00260311,0.0001903175,0.06400503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8047132,0.08966225,0.007727954,0.04817029,0.04212159,0.0003214561,0.001291321,0.0002478495,0.005744081],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9833753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7973123,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.234747263815293,"score_gpt":0.4285915427351509,"score_spread":0.1938442789198579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}