{"id":"W4384523646","doi":"10.1038/s44159-023-00212-w","title":"Drawing as a versatile cognitive tool","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Reviews Psychology","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"National Eye Institute; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Schematic; Cognition; Cognitive science; Perception; Comprehension; Inference; Diagrammatic reasoning; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001236606,0.0007725499,0.0003944451,0.00154295,0.0005680602,0.006509541,0.002072415,0.001439622,0.01197032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004269542,0.0002955804,0.000594176,0.001310366,0.005699067,0.007536594,0.00379993,0.001628321,0.002045017],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003279943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004637095,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001920443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001987226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988903,0.0003742908,0.00005088906,0.000224251,0.0003937188,0.00006663072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997306,0.00155249,0.0001706471,0.0005624113,0.0002133187,0.0001952377],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005575673,0.00002195282,0.0005710262,0.0003858553,0.00005052702,0.0002558709,0.001289111,0.002555952,0.01088023,0.7017593,0.006346161,0.2758282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001826567,0.00004453358,0.001128264,0.0001674286,0.00003317231,0.000496574,0.0004282663,0.003684833,0.003208787,0.9168268,0.07392237,0.0000408325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0835377,0.020138,0.5144293,0.007121025,0.001820881,0.0000743432,0.0003022154,0.001456423,0.3711202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8068467,0.01466752,0.1361638,0.001058656,0.0008395916,0.0001758167,0.0003744608,0.0005117428,0.03936177],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01197032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04004467,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07177062659426436,"score_gpt":0.4986031080566831,"score_spread":0.4268324814624188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}