{"id":"W4384692596","doi":"10.17713/ajs.v52i3.1302","title":"Taxicab Correspondence Analysis and Taxicab Logratio Analysis: A Comparison on Contingency Tables and Compositional Data","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Austrian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Contingency table; Correspondence analysis; Equivalence (formal languages); Mathematics; Data mining; Singular value decomposition; Computer science; Algorithm; Calculus (dental); Discrete mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001154128,0.0001382516,0.000475608,0.0004614285,0.0001881172,0.0002379315,0.001067482,0.00005985212,0.00004940224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000776756,0.0001216838,0.00004374883,0.001939514,0.0001273104,0.0003038354,0.000503545,0.0002450861,0.000004236445],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001104626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008158657,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002493108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004811608,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982854,0.0001330903,0.0005813384,0.0003786008,0.000406066,0.0002154803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973973,0.0009219986,0.0005968797,0.0006535381,0.0002675532,0.0001627545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004205029,0.0006218893,0.6439888,0.0001889605,0.01547527,0.001982292,0.002563477,0.04777666,0.002383497,0.03983473,0.1519598,0.09280411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005681938,0.0002332764,0.1628167,0.00004444146,0.001987312,0.00006693277,0.0003074395,0.8267767,0.00009862477,0.002628082,0.004242068,0.000230219],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03111648,0.0002169023,0.965571,0.001870807,0.0001340706,0.0000598327,0.000895953,0.00002255545,0.0001124109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9368295,0.000126157,0.06222948,0.00005640036,0.00006457153,6.600542e-7,0.0003763851,0.000001945769,0.0003148902],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.905713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4962122,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06043318961452403,"score_gpt":0.3121654724384177,"score_spread":0.2517322828238936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}