{"id":"W4384704290","doi":"10.3138/cjpe.71436","title":"Methods to Make Sense of Resilience: Lessons From Participant Coded Micronarratives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Livelihood; Psychological resilience; Community resilience; Narrative; Resilience (materials science); Participant observation; Climate change; Environmental resource management; Scale (ratio); Baseline (sea); Sociology; Environmental planning; Geography; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Social psychology; Ecology; Resource (disambiguation); Computer science; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1137904,0.001167001,0.0006440888,0.00430114,0.01300539,0.006646498,0.004862226,0.002200595,0.01225424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1408307,0.0008310233,0.0006588575,0.004250308,0.01862603,0.01146207,0.01760718,0.004063535,0.001164367],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01161477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01773014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01460203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03388825,"domain_scores_codex":[0.898632,0.0885143,0.002507715,0.003353555,0.005018807,0.001973571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8355365,0.1201855,0.004589988,0.01415829,0.02221981,0.003309985],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008219103,0.000106331,0.001511786,0.000409803,0.00001002103,0.0003025328,0.9318032,0.0001530666,0.0006811053,0.02249355,0.002325889,0.04012043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006934304,0.00009991495,0.00166873,0.001293124,0.0000180179,0.0003200475,0.8693935,0.0009344908,0.002519849,0.038018,0.08558686,0.00007812718],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4146321,0.002394226,0.4092027,0.02924068,0.001122699,0.01977482,0.002235838,0.0004470166,0.1209499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6688712,0.001069535,0.2758431,0.002172366,0.00008476064,0.03137688,0.0007050445,0.0004137257,0.0194634],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1137904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6017886,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2422532846471531,"score_gpt":0.4657858264517326,"score_spread":0.2235325418045795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}