{"id":"W4385145296","doi":"10.37766/inplasy2023.7.0093","title":"Health Economic Evaluation Methodological Quality Assessment Tools: A protocol for a systematic review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"EconLit; Systematic review; CINAHL; MEDLINE; Protocol (science); Quality (philosophy); Quality assessment; Health care; Agency (philosophy); Medicine; Management science; Political science; Alternative medicine; External quality assessment; Sociology; Social science; Engineering; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2385152,0.006147696,0.01647194,0.02015407,0.004904924,0.01038613,0.006151589,0.009471056,0.08119476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3198843,0.007442935,0.02289624,0.02131807,0.006527705,0.01081697,0.00838569,0.01392767,0.01717763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01603729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06740268,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003289561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005050268,"domain_scores_codex":[0.764966,0.1287923,0.07951853,0.007136607,0.01534502,0.004241536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7186331,0.1466789,0.04143854,0.02660317,0.06201148,0.004634881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005830512,0.0006584823,0.001068264,0.7585554,0.003913338,0.0004875451,0.003175719,0.002292852,0.001455368,0.01752666,0.09628474,0.1087511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02710911,0.00174189,0.005111843,0.6051716,0.005525389,0.0006486914,0.00252078,0.003301238,0.003195744,0.03276959,0.3121553,0.0007487483],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002283249,0.001432587,0.006371479,0.0007568782,0.0003939084,0.9848578,0.00492283,0.0001933985,0.0008427875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002580654,0.0006049559,0.01220585,0.0001501723,0.00002574431,0.9860968,0.0004561948,0.00001941445,0.0001828196],"genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7614848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9390463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9681174059625732,"score_gpt":0.7427692765873142,"score_spread":0.2253481293752591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}