{"id":"W4385264305","doi":"10.2196/47736","title":"Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stroke Risk Models: Retrospective Cohort Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Cardio","topic":"Acute Ischemic Stroke Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Research Council of Thailand","keywords":"Medicine; Logistic regression; Stroke (engine); Statistic; Cohort; Proportional hazards model; Retrospective cohort study; Machine learning; Hazard ratio; Naive Bayes classifier; Statistics; Decision tree; Boosting (machine learning); Artificial intelligence; Internal medicine; Computer science; Mathematics; Support vector machine; Confidence interval; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0547392,0.0009260896,0.0009266257,0.001885499,0.0004403883,0.0009721353,0.001240879,0.001158146,0.001147824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08899549,0.0004713979,0.002818553,0.0009891362,0.0006740203,0.001242413,0.001155365,0.0014255,0.0001732677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006083942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009090131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002728033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00225911,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9821091,0.01355493,0.001270299,0.001766135,0.000992013,0.0003075444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8818608,0.09200783,0.007996093,0.01304993,0.004066473,0.001018882],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002488869,0.000376605,0.9526941,0.0001859451,0.005282873,0.0001972769,0.0003219855,0.02153157,0.0002572144,0.0008088513,0.0005841528,0.01527053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006044022,0.007473468,0.5629103,0.0002247505,0.004080397,0.001118553,0.001100808,0.4141312,0.001148682,0.004988117,0.002051497,0.0001678143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685903,0.0007526515,0.02902428,0.000141554,0.0000495169,0.0002654533,0.0009628621,0.00004496259,0.0001683855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880918,0.0002524042,0.009677737,0.00005524311,0.00004872942,0.0002856832,0.001474977,0.00002091063,0.00009251454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0547392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.289492,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1788575098194468,"score_gpt":0.3812605876951467,"score_spread":0.2024030778756999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}