{"id":"W4385320852","doi":"10.18280/ijdne.180312","title":"Assessing the Ecological and Biological Forage Base of the Tobol River: Implications for Planktonic and Benthic Communities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics","topic":"Ecology and biodiversity studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Benthic zone; Plankton; Forage; Ecology; Geography; Fishery; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004707532,0.00005159702,0.0000872985,0.00002836167,0.0002991363,0.00003001335,0.0002262369,0.00009476923,0.000009094199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001149983,0.00002654424,0.00003638802,0.00005131224,0.000453047,0.0001146715,0.0002610467,0.0002275446,3.545938e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002569852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008534287,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006276011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009273204,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999606,0.00007149126,0.0001239944,0.00005500774,0.00007238394,0.00007115785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988663,0.0009017224,0.0001346496,0.00004259451,0.00003690059,0.00001790221],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000514269,0.0000482579,0.9921167,0.000004469984,0.000112088,0.000003593815,0.0008460687,0.0003297691,0.0004847946,0.002109997,0.001140239,0.00275257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002269341,0.00009976729,0.9854401,0.00001039458,0.00002587382,0.00006536065,0.001164957,0.002168724,0.00002169617,0.01046101,0.0002791164,0.00003604054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914868,0.0001766673,0.0006844266,0.007333708,0.0001313916,0.00009497566,0.00004166102,0.000003177896,0.0000471638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976848,0.0009706643,0.0008611125,0.0004436128,0.00001877496,0.00000197487,0.000003962701,0.000001291161,0.00001381946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008351009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2300745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04164973217903811,"score_gpt":0.2924003534343199,"score_spread":0.2507506212552817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}