{"id":"W4385688392","doi":"10.1620/tjem.2023.j066","title":"Risk Analysis of Breast Cancer by Using Bilateral Mammographic Density Differences: A Case-Control Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine","topic":"Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Aging","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Breast cancer; Medicine; Mammography; BI-RADS; Confidence interval; Odds ratio; Case-control study; MAMMOGRAPHIC DENSITY; Risk factors for breast cancer; Breast imaging; Risk factor; Cancer; Retrospective cohort study; Gynecology; Radiology; Obstetrics; Oncology; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008975302,0.0002302956,0.001014485,0.001077224,0.0001411355,0.00001873379,0.0001905774,0.00003891135,0.0002174145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003928615,0.0001224554,0.0004284845,0.00260914,0.0004059845,0.0001632681,0.00004150831,0.0002995853,6.726205e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000626203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004193194,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001773084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003102826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978761,0.0001925748,0.0007644587,0.0001878619,0.0006927639,0.000286248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984674,0.0001991161,0.0006379059,0.0002708331,0.0002022331,0.0002224708],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001342703,0.0007506086,0.9228597,0.00001606776,0.008328381,0.001750075,0.004459913,0.00006655881,0.0561915,0.00000303355,0.0002351446,0.00399628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006604466,0.00214545,0.9393162,0.000383453,0.01405724,0.009327807,0.02223716,0.003911298,0.001801215,0.00002666552,0.000003866779,0.0001852393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961191,0.002460411,0.00006745251,0.0006154162,0.0002382055,0.0003119865,0.0001244884,0.00002096841,0.00004194501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994592,0.0001083415,0.00001580433,0.0001468453,0.0002229692,0.000005104551,0.000003021723,0.00001778908,0.00002089284],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05439029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4993588,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02225667158137614,"score_gpt":0.3170652520430602,"score_spread":0.2948085804616841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}