{"id":"W4385840947","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105470","title":"Regulatory landscape of alternatives to animal testing in food safety evaluations with a focus on the western world","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","topic":"Animal testing and alternatives","field":"Veterinary","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Intertek (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Food safety; Risk analysis (engineering); Lagging; Regulatory focus theory; Business; Risk assessment; Legislation; Food contact materials; Environmental planning; Biotechnology; Computer science; Food packaging; Engineering; Medicine; Computer security; Political science; Environmental science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001301915,0.0005528011,0.00152953,0.0007655657,0.0002201892,0.00001637123,0.0004983823,0.0002701949,0.0001494505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002265707,0.000376909,0.000145467,0.0009796855,0.000466443,0.00006565166,0.0003058847,0.0008448164,0.00005305135],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001230858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000330032,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001014731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001228245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959533,0.001596955,0.0008711967,0.0007955192,0.0002558274,0.0005271531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933659,0.005386429,0.000663485,0.0003453309,0.00009931852,0.0001395487],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009981337,0.002416639,0.01675951,0.02095897,0.007695238,0.002000605,0.004793081,0.0006738802,0.004667377,0.03075746,0.006586457,0.8927094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01050871,0.07741124,0.2084886,0.05549478,0.005569895,0.002608767,0.0007249771,0.001344189,0.001174756,0.003240974,0.6276885,0.005744587],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4602544,0.5327277,0.000009660572,0.0006677528,0.0004497566,0.002807905,0.0002202727,0.0002224131,0.002640144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7587293,0.2353195,0.000383305,0.0007492184,0.001041141,0.001463943,0.00003409706,0.0003070763,0.001972323],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8869649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998683,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3146521195749267,"score_gpt":0.4717410176180242,"score_spread":0.1570888980430975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}