{"id":"W4386084628","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.9.1045","title":"Comparative value of dapagliflozin vs empagliflozin in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: A cost-effectiveness analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy","topic":"Diabetes Treatment and Management","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Advancing Health Outcomes","funders":"","keywords":"Empagliflozin; Dapagliflozin; Medicine; Ejection fraction; Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Cost effectiveness; Hazard ratio; Heart failure; Intensive care medicine; Internal medicine; Emergency medicine; Diabetes mellitus; Type 2 diabetes; Risk analysis (engineering); Confidence interval","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005295064,0.0002129866,0.0009284921,0.001169914,0.00007066517,0.00003668985,0.00009393902,0.00003888026,0.00007322351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003944635,0.000168761,0.0002174035,0.001788187,0.00005799357,0.0003210963,0.00006283946,0.0003035755,0.000005798457],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003184417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006042398,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008632537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002008364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981053,0.0003081693,0.0004926991,0.0002408317,0.0006155995,0.0002374031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986838,0.0001534472,0.0004056146,0.0001850032,0.0004291033,0.0001430869],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003575407,0.0004598938,0.9876306,0.0003009456,0.002538288,0.00005980114,0.0004110141,0.002109424,0.000123816,0.00001888953,0.00173067,0.001041258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01126759,0.0009476186,0.9728688,0.0002390788,0.003003797,0.000001388515,0.001483627,0.0003242591,0.001427971,0.00001860679,0.008278954,0.0001383078],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974042,0.000160074,0.00007842924,0.0003423296,0.0001653772,0.001183907,0.00001516381,0.00002065648,0.0006299118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992114,0.00008467052,0.0002979058,0.00006464659,0.0001721058,0.00002902293,0.00005961688,0.00001791862,0.00006265553],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01476179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6881876,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02672220519378532,"score_gpt":0.3308528337624001,"score_spread":0.3041306285686148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}