{"id":"W4386255162","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2023.2246727","title":"Pathways for improving the consideration of ecological connectivity in environmental assessment: lessons from five case studies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Government of Canada; University of Saskatchewan; Parks Canada; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Scale (ratio); Mainstreaming; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Environmental science; Cartography; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04492147,0.0008887127,0.00071478,0.003184077,0.01225574,0.009598734,0.003450446,0.004481642,0.00511174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06395895,0.0006931211,0.0009270771,0.004726729,0.009884115,0.0124119,0.01077797,0.004564146,0.0003296024],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02117084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0210734,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07177667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.205349,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9485175,0.04187888,0.001724995,0.001084009,0.003281954,0.003512685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9115703,0.06613499,0.003003357,0.003397941,0.01213755,0.003755916],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003073468,0.001142478,0.06934011,0.002619522,0.0001439703,0.03181105,0.3899582,0.02580654,0.001725194,0.2594126,0.01803647,0.1996965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007957745,0.000335129,0.01129011,0.004117843,0.0001288331,0.004967325,0.6816496,0.01065656,0.002407083,0.1026177,0.1815555,0.0001948212],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6543194,0.004639177,0.1458558,0.04689974,0.0003367809,0.002306136,0.0002912325,0.0002038506,0.1451478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.932539,0.001816111,0.06030239,0.0009642732,0.00001769947,0.0005030266,0.00008040811,0.00006155809,0.003715701],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07177667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2375703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07520058937664281,"score_gpt":0.4247332613032365,"score_spread":0.3495326719265937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}