{"id":"W4386255162","doi":"10.1080/14615517.2023.2246727","title":"Pathways for improving the consideration of ecological connectivity in environmental assessment: lessons from five case studies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal","topic":"Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Impact; Government of Canada; University of Saskatchewan; Parks Canada; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Scale (ratio); Mainstreaming; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Environmental impact assessment; Political science; Geography; Sociology; Environmental science; Cartography; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007221021,0.0001639716,0.0002317604,0.00006371271,0.0002874989,0.00006432384,0.00007434985,0.00006965238,0.0001107874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001600283,0.0001112788,0.00007627699,0.0001878791,0.0001903936,0.0003869124,0.0001606023,0.0001702851,0.000003617939],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002327425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007847387,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002164932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001018056,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987974,0.0001961423,0.0002919527,0.0003041379,0.0001765714,0.0002337498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974182,0.002204953,0.0001805795,0.0001532859,0.000009249032,0.00003374182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000128491,0.0004810181,0.9218667,0.00003024725,0.0001723754,0.0001062071,0.005846506,0.000893212,0.03992353,0.001048454,0.002427178,0.0270761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008726351,0.0004507463,0.9264102,0.00001170815,0.00004778346,0.00005857347,0.01188944,0.05861279,0.0003667796,0.0009989364,0.0001047297,0.0001757105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975731,0.00002190453,0.0003385139,0.0006807724,0.0001655772,0.0007673149,0.0001993087,0.000030175,0.0002233615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985849,0.00004158755,0.0008855807,0.00006163915,0.00004323177,0.0002750142,0.0000800199,0.00001009167,0.00001792666],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05771958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4537816,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07520058937664281,"score_gpt":0.4247332613032365,"score_spread":0.3495326719265937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}