{"id":"W4386402131","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04818-y","title":"The Matthew Effect in China’s social sciences and humanities research: a comparative analysis of CSSCI and SSCI","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science","keywords":"Elite; China; Humanities; Social science; Citation analysis; Political science; Sociology; Citation; Philosophy; Law; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003954055,0.0002203589,0.0006968646,0.01651744,0.001150262,0.002043235,0.0006277654,0.0003316044,0.003718718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02721833,0.0001128998,0.000763743,0.02006832,0.002426644,0.002019402,0.001857116,0.0005480507,0.000277303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002759111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00459288,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03709773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03866449,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997483,0.0005211221,0.0002509925,0.0003364014,0.001104885,0.0003036477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9600447,0.022692,0.007790168,0.001975156,0.005009877,0.002488093],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007810246,0.00002082207,0.9604102,0.0002080033,0.0002545145,0.000204245,0.001019989,0.0006354549,0.0001969027,0.01344298,0.001830396,0.02169842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008750542,0.00004046391,0.9917657,0.00004350104,0.0001945098,0.0000855607,0.001462752,0.001410652,0.0001698258,0.001909489,0.002894436,0.00001442388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701474,0.003595116,0.0009362575,0.001052802,0.00006818038,0.00003051604,0.001110035,0.00008637444,0.02297316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989367,0.0002758231,0.0001575666,0.0000173558,0.00004715232,0.000005569495,0.0002263331,0.000005787874,0.0003277562],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07376355,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8933759979167228,"score_gpt":0.6993538977340414,"score_spread":0.1940221001826814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}