{"id":"W4386402131","doi":"10.1007/s11192-023-04818-y","title":"The Matthew Effect in China’s social sciences and humanities research: a comparative analysis of CSSCI and SSCI","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science","keywords":"Elite; China; Humanities; Social science; Citation analysis; Political science; Sociology; Citation; Philosophy; Law; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics","metaresearch"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1683591,0.0001738601,0.0006612338,0.3412481,0.002451258,0.005006837,0.002592872,0.00009899321,0.00004339145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05437996,0.00009947104,0.0001460681,0.8052661,0.005054522,0.00059657,0.002112086,0.0004285107,0.0000443656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001129867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002026607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004613081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004632527,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9793149,0.001457837,0.0008258275,0.001019565,0.01614738,0.00123453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631076,0.03378254,0.0002916148,0.0004913129,0.002099012,0.0002279545],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005090946,0.0001022675,0.8792315,0.00002476202,0.0001277269,0.00001216823,0.008029198,0.0001813181,0.0003174551,0.02385878,0.01084425,0.07721969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000293087,0.0003163465,0.9579375,0.000006482069,0.00002288063,7.830575e-7,0.004536004,0.02535298,0.0001302659,0.007529927,0.003748953,0.000124774],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880736,0.002400854,0.00002793315,0.001026407,0.000230227,0.000356228,0.00005069463,0.00002069254,0.00781332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977904,0.0008165282,0.00006689679,0.00002872517,0.00002547205,0.00001970885,0.000002392713,0.000004846009,0.001245055],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.464018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8933759979167228,"score_gpt":0.6993538977340414,"score_spread":0.1940221001826814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}