{"id":"W4386407918","doi":"10.1017/s0714980823000429","title":"The ‘Double Risk’ of Aging: Examining Vulnerability and (Un)supportive Built Environments in Canadian Cities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement","topic":"Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Disadvantaged; Built environment; Vulnerability (computing); Geography; Psychological intervention; Aging in place; Poverty; Gerontology; Scale (ratio); Population; Environmental health; Psychology; Economic growth; Medicine; Engineering; Cartography; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001752315,0.0004592135,0.0005967834,0.003319021,0.008627367,0.003058935,0.001643272,0.0005813895,0.001415686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005414409,0.0002694129,0.0007830558,0.006754673,0.00292573,0.00123561,0.004914811,0.000887371,0.000083497],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03936574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05174091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9975488,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984505,0.0002329679,0.00006836792,0.0001417514,0.0004569711,0.0006494534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969847,0.0003309798,0.0006129641,0.0001443745,0.001122041,0.0008050564],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008186571,0.00005640727,0.9198217,0.0001666312,0.0001020328,0.0003012314,0.05610637,0.0004647063,0.0001774758,0.003176489,0.001818882,0.01772623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002173736,0.00002055791,0.9166844,0.0001255968,0.00003907864,0.00006492253,0.07946997,0.0003504789,0.00005206668,0.0003513373,0.002810308,0.00002905754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940584,0.0005894261,0.0001477929,0.0005381802,0.00001241758,0.00004220418,0.0004356177,0.000003886739,0.004172084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989932,0.0002947527,0.0001475712,0.00005380228,0.000002963087,0.00001615585,0.0001223558,0.000002121574,0.0003669969],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03936574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2856197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02135230359113895,"score_gpt":0.2503316589604252,"score_spread":0.2289793553692863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}