{"id":"W4386407918","doi":"10.1017/s0714980823000429","title":"The ‘Double Risk’ of Aging: Examining Vulnerability and (Un)supportive Built Environments in Canadian Cities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement","topic":"Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Neighbourhood (mathematics); Disadvantaged; Built environment; Vulnerability (computing); Geography; Psychological intervention; Aging in place; Poverty; Gerontology; Scale (ratio); Population; Environmental health; Psychology; Economic growth; Medicine; Engineering; Cartography; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004541102,0.0002087741,0.00028393,0.0006063178,0.002840246,0.0002149951,0.0003505576,0.00007906538,0.0001055525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000652293,0.0001910191,0.00006640612,0.0005372832,0.000481396,0.0001687802,0.00002527349,0.000428663,0.000006253493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001586417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001473199,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9759758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999621,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973052,0.0004650292,0.0004879946,0.000315353,0.0001911599,0.001235331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997399,0.0003958271,0.0002845825,0.0002375796,0.00008859044,0.001594392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004551086,0.000007544282,0.6753799,0.00001841225,0.00008718911,0.0002970815,0.3128785,0.000266682,0.000005556378,0.004611264,0.002219314,0.00422399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000358184,0.000050249,0.7591833,0.000145401,0.00003015831,0.00001253889,0.02102537,0.00009772153,0.00001450359,0.001432761,0.2174249,0.0002249609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898003,0.0007960252,0.000005919609,0.006429035,0.0005837647,0.0002685885,0.00005007382,0.00001157735,0.002054672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956507,0.00249725,0.00001799411,0.000164749,0.0002326084,0.00002720445,0.000007835657,0.00002188988,0.001379785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2918532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984579,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02135230359113895,"score_gpt":0.2503316589604252,"score_spread":0.2289793553692863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}