{"id":"W4386807073","doi":"10.1002/hyp.14987","title":"When good signatures go bad: Applying hydrologic signatures in large sample studies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrological Processes","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canmore Museum and Geoscience Centre; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Division of Earth Sciences; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Signature (topology); Streamflow; Sample (material); Flood myth; Hydrological modelling; Watershed; Replicate; Computer science; Event (particle physics); Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; Data mining; Geology; Statistics; Geography; Cartography; Machine learning; Climatology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.508202,0.0009063589,0.002106454,0.005627572,0.00442543,0.008155011,0.004952035,0.00759343,0.001599933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7993283,0.0009373418,0.001684912,0.006259311,0.01136879,0.009266708,0.007278327,0.005297144,0.0004191631],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003104247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008282189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005886901,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01476441,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4806242,0.4598331,0.02975081,0.008083039,0.02001654,0.001692223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1309192,0.7508001,0.03490459,0.03827729,0.04223708,0.002861727],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001755715,0.0005393791,0.4277424,0.006060621,0.00334063,0.004723281,0.1054834,0.004187342,0.002640323,0.04299419,0.04858589,0.3519468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008982313,0.00604372,0.2776462,0.02833978,0.004371895,0.005516618,0.1224977,0.04997701,0.01227511,0.3400472,0.1515009,0.0008857758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4366588,0.01366274,0.3224098,0.1951192,0.007398688,0.006571837,0.001272233,0.0007643236,0.01614242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7668476,0.00186038,0.2025636,0.02150816,0.001856945,0.004056617,0.0002087529,0.000167199,0.0009309092],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.491798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6064745,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02963528857070686,"score_gpt":0.2743914752461802,"score_spread":0.2447561866754733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}