{"id":"W4387056136","doi":"10.3390/engproc2023043038","title":"Life Cycle Cost Assessment of an Existing All-Aluminum Bridge: Comparison of Two Deck Options","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Concrete Corrosion and Durability","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Bridge (graph theory); Deck; Bridge deck; Life-cycle cost analysis; Service life; Life-cycle assessment; Engineering; Reliability engineering; Bridge maintenance; Material selection; Forensic engineering; Computer science; Construction engineering; Structural engineering; Transport engineering; Materials science; Production (economics)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008222786,0.0007024696,0.0006641273,0.003056006,0.0003809183,0.001155381,0.0008800213,0.000613405,0.002568159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001306405,0.0001949947,0.000928445,0.001732752,0.0003218474,0.0007515888,0.0003754116,0.0003577904,0.000287094],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004884817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001232323,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07409438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1449668,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995407,0.0000590879,0.00001776015,0.0000518715,0.0002495511,0.00008114753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992453,0.0002361813,0.00007643116,0.00004829969,0.0003436896,0.00005009252],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002772683,0.000715884,0.06637361,0.0007183425,0.0003170963,0.0007805105,0.0002959483,0.7689964,0.03868122,0.002658394,0.001207362,0.1164825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015018,0.005917863,0.3274495,0.0001296931,0.0005785747,0.0006350801,0.00176668,0.6281176,0.02637453,0.0011611,0.007534449,0.0001847869],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900276,0.0005140323,0.002256619,0.00003622695,0.000007498315,0.00007521667,0.0008528212,0.0000253537,0.006204485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958113,0.0002291533,0.001526381,0.000006219571,0.000001992046,0.00002377466,0.0007248941,0.00001062839,0.001665645],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07409438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1473262,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1032293319719788,"score_gpt":0.3992876458053991,"score_spread":0.2960583138334203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}