{"id":"W4387170333","doi":"10.3390/info14100533","title":"Evaluation of Smart Contract Vulnerability Analysis Tools: A Domain-Specific Perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Vulnerability (computing); Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Risk analysis (engineering); Perspective (graphical); Computer security; Smart contract; Abstraction; Vulnerability assessment; Data science; Software engineering; Artificial intelligence; Business; Blockchain","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00318377,0.00006843633,0.0001394114,0.0004910774,0.0001119023,0.00006409154,0.0003517248,0.0000880264,0.00002796328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001355488,0.00006578574,0.00008715884,0.002744404,0.00005690906,0.001135237,0.00007621931,0.0001021308,0.00009697075],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001642008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007497045,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005805689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003465834,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987659,0.00010465,0.000335604,0.0001384306,0.000532005,0.0001233352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980057,0.0001049941,0.0001961849,0.0005801573,0.001089004,0.00002394262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000536979,0.00004348313,0.0007129785,0.000006187976,0.000142277,1.196184e-7,0.006330414,0.002410719,0.00007289951,0.8322457,0.000262009,0.1577678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004947941,0.00004486082,0.1103713,0.000003965716,0.0001064479,0.000001549072,0.001505417,0.7550575,0.001073168,0.126847,0.004357478,0.0001364898],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4644037,0.00004708696,0.5303746,0.001036288,0.00006319116,0.0003854719,0.00001440812,0.0002923371,0.003382833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966525,0.00001615393,0.003151121,0.00003524279,0.000007354442,0.0001055949,0.00002830985,0.000001223284,0.000002430671],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7526468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2682665,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03591599558607542,"score_gpt":0.3006036500204747,"score_spread":0.2646876544343992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}