{"id":"W4387329638","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpca.3c04332","title":"Comparison of Density-Functional Theory Dispersion Corrections for the DES15K Database","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry A","topic":"Advanced Chemical Physics Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Killam Trusts","keywords":"Density functional theory; Dispersion (optics); Ionic bonding; Dipole; Chemistry; Benchmarking; Outlier; Computational chemistry; Database; Materials science; Ion; Computer science; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002653008,0.00172925,0.002219701,0.002770718,0.0009811419,0.001455815,0.003719102,0.00144308,0.007087406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007738682,0.0005349373,0.001299765,0.003823893,0.0003404649,0.001722204,0.0009591303,0.001293929,0.003301035],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001747237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001584604,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01086444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01517502,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982603,0.0004846397,0.000165272,0.000212439,0.0007742815,0.0001030734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973301,0.001206353,0.0001189066,0.000451691,0.0007947083,0.00009831588],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002153631,0.00118435,0.02326491,0.005933381,0.002991067,0.001030922,0.0005402119,0.5106212,0.008878784,0.04308524,0.2919002,0.1084161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009438118,0.0009255538,0.01293503,0.0005012355,0.0004090823,0.0006228297,0.0005380366,0.7640672,0.01508455,0.02236846,0.1813435,0.0002606893],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7103979,0.01581597,0.02684344,0.001829838,0.0006081187,0.0003785384,0.1843493,0.01530875,0.04446812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5281162,0.005745273,0.06136779,0.0008204838,0.0001268364,0.0008805256,0.3920706,0.005671325,0.005200914],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01086444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02370977,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02941505412581882,"score_gpt":0.3195477303384829,"score_spread":0.2901326762126641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}