{"id":"W4387375742","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2023-0222","title":"Unified life-cycle cost–benefit analysis framework and critical review for sustainable retrofit of Canada's existing buildings using mass timber","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Sustainable Building Design and Assessment","field":"Engineering","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"Canadian Forest Service","keywords":"Retrofitting; Life-cycle cost analysis; Architectural engineering; Context (archaeology); Engineering; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01950104,0.002031312,0.001993779,0.01354597,0.002492964,0.006434108,0.0037437,0.0025314,0.002900169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02572642,0.0008729979,0.002028905,0.009680007,0.003001058,0.003101231,0.001409257,0.002830107,0.0004256784],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07157304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1233881,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5258775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6314586,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919835,0.002625043,0.000457965,0.0003262386,0.004020712,0.0005865254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753686,0.009491049,0.001172473,0.000453944,0.01311579,0.0003980826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001549887,0.0001097613,0.0016682,0.03356488,0.0005499014,0.0006855641,0.001551261,0.06866213,0.001619919,0.4315488,0.06572477,0.3941599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004488409,0.0002390466,0.004152213,0.05597582,0.00116541,0.0003295445,0.002359878,0.02913885,0.002100504,0.09928652,0.804966,0.0002413432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.004998681,0.8475302,0.07368183,0.02503303,0.001341375,0.001634976,0.001765013,0.0001353643,0.04387948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1460949,0.7309732,0.1069883,0.004087944,0.0008481729,0.001952593,0.001120943,0.00009825302,0.007835638],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4741225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9538293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01908952246053994,"score_gpt":0.2558865167876254,"score_spread":0.2367969943270855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}