{"id":"W4387675733","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2023.10.005","title":"Compensation schemes for plant quarantine pest costs: A case study for Germany","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Analysis and Policy","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bundesministerium für Verbraucherschutz, Ernährung und Landwirtschaft; Ministry of Agriculture and Food","keywords":"Quarantine; Context (archaeology); Compensation (psychology); Willingness to pay; Agriculture; Business; Externality; Natural resource economics; Production (economics); Economics; Agricultural economics; Agricultural science; Geography; Microeconomics; Environmental science; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007512968,0.0001493084,0.0005004902,0.0006651888,0.0002274643,0.00008349556,0.00008096876,0.0000584237,0.0001089041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002915427,0.0001778311,0.0002166901,0.0001936775,0.00003527525,0.0001686153,0.00003669556,0.00003741909,0.0002523971],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002195369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001673587,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004032713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001134566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986746,0.00001152127,0.0006256929,0.000434795,0.00001130743,0.0002421186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992366,0.0001429823,0.0003240925,0.0002177856,0.000006581567,0.00007199121],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045013,0.0001426056,0.8805147,0.00003646132,0.001746773,0.000007176689,0.001675651,0.002057149,0.000008294825,0.1090337,0.001711007,0.003021458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004012773,0.0003541851,0.4492407,0.000005164024,0.0005523947,0.00003802103,0.003825538,0.4967021,0.00002511284,0.006148117,0.03840553,0.0006903664],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.993633,0.0001075944,0.003335189,0.0006081399,0.0001095652,0.0006701401,0.001040896,0.0000332571,0.000462159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976971,0.0001361221,0.0002246552,0.0001451584,0.0003212433,0.0002363717,0.0004166883,0.00002141938,0.0008012437],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4946449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7251742,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.096041064550838,"score_gpt":0.292348146571847,"score_spread":0.196307082021009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}