{"id":"W4387696876","doi":"10.46298/cm.11138","title":"Well-Rounded ideal lattices of cyclic cubic and quartic fields","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Communications in Mathematics","topic":"Rings, Modules, and Algebras","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Quartic function; Ideal (ethics); Mathematics; Prime (order theory); Quartic surface; Prime ideal; Pure mathematics; Minimal ideal; Field (mathematics); Cyclic group; Algebraic number field; Combinatorics; Maximal ideal; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007718928,0.0001326067,0.000323389,0.0002162544,0.0001215651,0.00003637904,0.000723434,0.00009692804,0.0000282662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006261741,0.000127714,0.00005573974,0.0004813573,0.000226755,0.0001128119,0.0003866375,0.0002214298,0.00006837415],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002267913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002565546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002692082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002538293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987706,0.00009828492,0.0006117405,0.0001388484,0.0001744192,0.0002060851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959084,0.002120477,0.000225199,0.001649081,0.00005241141,0.00004437664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004127024,0.0005510073,0.002862674,0.001013708,0.00006191787,0.000002611586,0.01560753,0.00002150469,0.0004952541,0.9757345,0.00189356,0.001751601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003164505,0.0000270856,0.00194936,0.0002733608,0.00003637234,0.000006734295,0.002949648,0.01668264,0.0003806842,0.9766441,0.0005732097,0.0001603562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852402,0.0004374486,0.0007593573,0.001095986,0.00004557952,0.0002841614,0.000003733443,0.0001401088,0.01199346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481773,0.001216067,0.04994275,0.00002728339,0.00001494466,0.00004818444,0.000007210027,0.00002680759,0.0005394148],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0491834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5208027,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1073506051184094,"score_gpt":0.3655069569783898,"score_spread":0.2581563518599804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}