{"id":"W4387704724","doi":"10.1177/10608265231207399","title":"Reading <i>Foreskin Quarterly</i> : Aesthetics as Argument Against Circumcision","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Men s Studies","topic":"Genital Health and Disease","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Foreskin; Argument (complex analysis); Pornography; Scholarship; Reading (process); Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Law; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002882346,0.0004520245,0.0002306074,0.001185247,0.006376688,0.008967482,0.0005809898,0.003074645,0.005078916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005311157,0.0001874529,0.0002059603,0.0007359907,0.03214679,0.005310062,0.003139942,0.004776346,0.0006242087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002628685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001590627,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00205714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003837894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972805,0.001931934,0.00004103899,0.0001499925,0.0003875954,0.0002090129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953615,0.003495718,0.0003596298,0.0001751884,0.0002766739,0.0003312262],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004069986,0.00002311358,0.0008344713,0.0001989514,0.000005977682,0.0004783304,0.1471752,0.00009198888,0.0007610435,0.769722,0.06060832,0.02005984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001043422,0.00008532601,0.001646032,0.0007202841,0.00001091597,0.0008903151,0.1145509,0.0001854373,0.000877094,0.09676792,0.7842324,0.0000229997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06420927,0.04473517,0.009353136,0.2467537,0.01440138,0.00003925701,0.00003890712,0.0001340233,0.6203352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88155,0.01022048,0.002334315,0.02773228,0.007504028,0.0000455958,0.00002212264,0.0002384033,0.07035281],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008967482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01907253,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03965027854995385,"score_gpt":0.3570559521843715,"score_spread":0.3174056736344177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}