{"id":"W4387805288","doi":"10.1080/08164649.2023.2267759","title":"Reading Group as Method for Feminist Environmental Humanities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Feminist Studies","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Poetics; Situated; Feminism; Ethos; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Gender studies; Aesthetics; Social science; Political science; Art; Law; Literature; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Poetry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009283957,0.0002323099,0.0003279469,0.0001792006,0.007359096,0.0001531615,0.0004684882,0.00005146877,0.001628376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001859538,0.0002669043,0.0002580367,0.0001936005,0.000989178,0.0001633214,0.0003172066,0.0002803819,0.00006881856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003644244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003142485,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001140954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001978819,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978704,0.0002320834,0.0003656086,0.000445165,0.0004915254,0.000595232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987473,0.0007031591,0.000208546,0.0002211397,0.00002892307,0.00009096094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001840475,0.0004781626,0.008066712,0.0000677533,0.001030067,0.00005579988,0.2743132,0.00001602963,0.001015402,0.4000759,0.3136537,0.00104326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001365039,0.0002726376,0.0003978499,0.000007249238,0.0000685023,0.000009056413,0.4710616,4.977011e-7,0.00005329625,0.002639248,0.5251698,0.0001838317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3002002,0.002149838,0.00003704513,0.02572219,0.01026586,0.005117944,0.002525664,0.001336979,0.6526443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.923341,0.00009971045,0.003602106,0.0008971792,0.0003635585,0.0007842953,0.0000376775,0.0000316332,0.07084283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6231408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09878485839749014,"score_gpt":0.4066395976144631,"score_spread":0.307854739216973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}