{"id":"W4387805288","doi":"10.1080/08164649.2023.2267759","title":"Reading Group as Method for Feminist Environmental Humanities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian Feminist Studies","topic":"Geographies of human-animal interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Poetics; Situated; Feminism; Ethos; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Interpretation (philosophy); Gender studies; Aesthetics; Social science; Political science; Art; Law; Literature; Philosophy; Computer science; Linguistics; Poetry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05524132,0.0008862861,0.0008516338,0.006360011,0.007418858,0.007522132,0.00287538,0.002706557,0.04823293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05627635,0.0006887878,0.0006072576,0.00571686,0.02665112,0.007775697,0.01086016,0.005942376,0.007499279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00462856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006127443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001848276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003579347,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9368351,0.05558028,0.001165892,0.002756071,0.002832778,0.0008298999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9133658,0.06726354,0.001760942,0.01329437,0.003166874,0.001148563],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009168626,0.00009823487,0.000647474,0.0006897165,0.00001627701,0.0002684236,0.2699615,0.0002254066,0.001531271,0.5506318,0.03017315,0.1456652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006844156,0.0001077517,0.0009597496,0.0009837291,0.00001279703,0.0003511147,0.07411627,0.0008144245,0.001566351,0.2036041,0.7173662,0.00004902454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01829907,0.001888503,0.6186513,0.02195279,0.003778344,0.005471512,0.001180576,0.001728095,0.3270499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2254233,0.001646516,0.6362652,0.005146724,0.001233112,0.02698123,0.0007142013,0.002584426,0.1000052],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05524132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2921475,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09878485839749014,"score_gpt":0.4066395976144631,"score_spread":0.307854739216973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}