{"id":"W4387845166","doi":"10.1177/21695067231193650","title":"Where to gaze during take-over: Eye gaze strategy analysis of different situation awareness and hazard perception levels","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Gaze; Eye tracking; Perception; Hazard; Relevance (law); Computer science; Process (computing); Tracking (education); Psychology; Eye movement; Cognitive psychology; Applied psychology; Artificial intelligence; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004667313,0.0002895073,0.0001971901,0.0008288062,0.0001922522,0.0004938127,0.00009890588,0.0002296363,0.00149232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002955727,0.00009755536,0.0001896979,0.0003396007,0.0001943236,0.0003684493,0.0003252829,0.0001950057,0.0001948456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002299316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002484017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004683127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00765194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997365,0.00006323938,0.00001974716,0.00006595394,0.00006459487,0.00004998745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988639,0.0004606914,0.0002400237,0.00005126678,0.000291278,0.00009283144],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002167932,0.0003530651,0.6794029,0.0002943734,0.0001991133,0.0003269267,0.009022084,0.001028592,0.2276018,0.000277541,0.0004360349,0.07888956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007091776,0.0002901851,0.9912744,0.00001229063,0.00004345794,0.0001302841,0.00178705,0.001073637,0.005050068,0.0000794431,0.0002387227,0.00001328936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978039,0.0000743269,0.001430538,0.00001643669,0.000002262483,0.00001977541,0.00006479132,0.00001517683,0.0005728956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988065,0.00005554784,0.0007445472,0.00001071995,0.000002254043,0.0000185332,0.00007513288,0.00000474199,0.0002820694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004683127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009311736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0345353679170453,"score_gpt":0.3263863843247478,"score_spread":0.2918510164077025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}