{"id":"W4387860519","doi":"10.1002/pra2.886","title":"Developing Critical Information Literacy Pedagogies in the Face of Scholarly Misconduct","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Higher Education Commission, Pakistan; Purdue University","keywords":"Information literacy; Misconduct; Critical literacy; Publishing; Categorization; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Public relations; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Social science; Medicine; Computer science; Alternative medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1106466,0.0004734496,0.001036068,0.005989671,0.007291783,0.009863077,0.003609944,0.003323707,0.003969409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2860353,0.000800793,0.0008099519,0.001836824,0.01334195,0.0151246,0.02229747,0.007663989,0.0007194274],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00512579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03219632,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008299656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001710323,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9105954,0.07420915,0.003048085,0.00193046,0.00771986,0.002496976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5391075,0.4042139,0.02143761,0.01194302,0.01641448,0.006883462],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007640945,0.001067687,0.01298917,0.004500146,0.0000758274,0.001056987,0.585903,0.000389281,0.001586963,0.05496393,0.006733567,0.330657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001866094,0.0008563633,0.01180537,0.02721955,0.0002076307,0.001977528,0.5541958,0.002243513,0.008597061,0.2564298,0.1361312,0.0001495778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.5874119,0.01054072,0.1415697,0.1471755,0.001486068,0.003399074,0.00008183342,0.0005554281,0.1077797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933234,0.00427431,0.05167615,0.005914162,0.0002630223,0.001685748,0.00004346825,0.00005844362,0.002850663],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5851623,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04088612117970004,"score_gpt":0.3629261902064031,"score_spread":0.3220400690267031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}