{"id":"W4387939563","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13023","title":"Uncovering antagonisms in recovery planning for species at risk: A diagnostic approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Science and Practice","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough","keywords":"Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biodiversity; Antagonism; Redundancy (engineering); Identification (biology); Geography; Risk analysis (engineering); Ecology; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Biology; Environmental science; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002610607,0.00007722398,0.00008203614,0.00007872064,0.0004972305,0.0001374813,0.0001413911,0.00003285379,0.0005127134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01210046,0.00007468457,0.00001582942,0.001265517,0.0003444393,0.001288083,0.0001988834,0.00006788757,0.0001789503],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004132915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003438731,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003086559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001190986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988565,0.00005107066,0.0001564113,0.0003188631,0.0003500524,0.0002671398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971804,0.002462122,0.0001248674,0.0001278171,0.00003943329,0.00006536197],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003374905,0.0001109507,0.908882,0.00004287724,0.000007745242,0.00001868306,0.004071277,0.003625147,0.0269324,0.002036753,0.04878798,0.005146657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003434049,0.00004608423,0.8305498,0.00001023435,0.000009100579,0.00001749416,0.007501115,0.003163476,0.0006297447,0.0003157381,0.1572743,0.0001395257],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9614208,0.0000414151,0.0006007563,0.002516534,0.0001549698,0.0002733707,0.00004165968,0.00004583689,0.03490462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948468,0.0006970341,0.0009584273,0.002195146,0.00002924614,0.0001166717,0.0000627046,0.000008853408,0.001085146],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1084863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962211,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09231818569673278,"score_gpt":0.3227860845317922,"score_spread":0.2304678988350594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}