{"id":"W4388104634","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2023-0053","title":"Contrasting strengths of eDNA and electrofishing compared to historic records for assessing fish community diversity and composition","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Bundesamt für Umwelt; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Electrofishing; Species richness; Diversity index; Environmental DNA; Biodiversity; Fishery; Ecology; Biomass (ecology); Species diversity; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Environmental science; Biology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003163329,0.0004290148,0.0003618055,0.003013137,0.0003351261,0.000922824,0.0004715399,0.0003589388,0.0007819046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005504587,0.0002313194,0.0002387431,0.002251134,0.0006405068,0.0008992326,0.0014483,0.0002556537,0.000188738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003261997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001928927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004897256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03465237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977602,0.0007389067,0.000193665,0.0006096117,0.0005775189,0.0001201324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955429,0.001386138,0.001352114,0.0004936962,0.0009514882,0.0002736556],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009929726,0.00002197487,0.9727516,0.0001031957,0.000175714,0.00003705913,0.0006063082,0.0003338027,0.006002397,0.0000971461,0.00004677101,0.01972466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000288518,0.00007096129,0.9973887,0.0000321033,0.00004365557,0.0001077569,0.0004346058,0.0005269602,0.000747262,0.0001001561,0.000535302,0.000009825581],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917659,0.0009264983,0.00418389,0.00002715218,0.00001557694,0.00003002567,0.0004453902,0.00001693614,0.002588605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950418,0.0003292812,0.003480711,0.00003297977,0.00002294547,0.00003085218,0.0005754409,0.000008358543,0.0004775266],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004897256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01672947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03989446898453616,"score_gpt":0.2382643428302162,"score_spread":0.1983698738456801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}