{"id":"W4388146477","doi":"10.15353/cjo.v84i1.4392","title":"The Inevitable Challenge of Ethical Dilemmas in Optometry, Part 1: When Confidentiality is Tested","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Face (sociological concept); Legislation; Ethical issues; Space (punctuation); Field (mathematics); Psychology; Masking (illustration); Ethical dilemma; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02090823,0.0005737908,0.001949897,0.006427453,0.002160906,0.0001906699,0.002806344,0.0008815,0.01662221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01155787,0.0004856791,0.0006853246,0.005246498,0.0009449995,0.0007788212,0.0001846639,0.0108838,0.00004994038],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002858755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02171668,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02972537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01275632,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9861772,0.003821471,0.004831851,0.0004719666,0.002402748,0.002294771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980552,0.005642471,0.004267354,0.0009486678,0.00283422,0.005755338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002095081,0.0001193658,0.8986841,0.0003552359,0.0004223681,0.0008187678,0.006625857,0.00006630193,0.00002497969,0.0001190713,0.09179578,0.0007586117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003454159,0.0009852762,0.4758448,0.001173571,0.0002945638,0.0005690337,0.0280891,0.00006086696,0.00006934794,0.0001507543,0.4886819,0.0006266293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8866649,0.008112401,0.00009349437,0.09526093,0.005492265,0.0006712421,0.0004274969,0.000007986694,0.003269335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930466,0.0005786667,0.0004591575,0.003614925,0.001199003,0.00002244938,0.00001273341,0.0000915637,0.0009749286],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4228393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06337837000720181,"score_gpt":0.4337655585619331,"score_spread":0.3703871885547312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}