{"id":"W4388203765","doi":"10.4103/cs.cs_129_22","title":"Ontological Politics and Conservation in Thailand: Communities Making Rivers and Fish Matter","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation and Society","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Community-based conservation; Dominance (genetics); Politics; Agency (philosophy); State (computer science); Environmental resource management; Government (linguistics); Drainage basin; Ethnic group; Endangered species; Geography; Political science; Sociology; Environmental planning; Social science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004374923,0.00007596066,0.000135254,0.00002357393,0.0007019647,0.00009153532,0.00004509512,0.0001139847,0.00003533767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001307488,0.00007498762,0.0000245487,0.0001524838,0.001164906,0.0001240519,0.00007592019,0.0001185753,0.000005515186],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004503075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003144041,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003768368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003447584,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992424,0.0001605326,0.0001316399,0.0001087125,0.0001230731,0.0002335967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992127,0.0005937929,0.00003482229,0.00005142316,0.00005052729,0.00005672877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000190774,0.000005101764,0.8401934,0.00001930416,0.000009008382,7.233276e-7,0.09585821,5.472358e-8,0.000001163848,0.05772443,0.006050777,0.0001359625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002407315,0.000005744399,0.743875,0.00002492924,0.00000645759,6.047086e-7,0.2368928,0.0003072378,2.866149e-7,0.01053971,0.008030188,0.00007625106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9430658,0.00005791751,0.00001385895,0.05048027,0.00004289021,0.0001249094,0.00001444854,0.00006796469,0.006131996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886716,0.0003960248,0.0001906158,0.01024651,0.00003109566,0.00001163778,0.000009822358,0.000004524313,0.0004381724],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1410346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5696671,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07010934310900117,"score_gpt":0.3255568635938706,"score_spread":0.2554475204848695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}