{"id":"W4388211201","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2023-0171","title":"Environmental determinants of round goby invasion refuges at a river scale: implications for conservation of native biodiversity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; St. Lawrence River Institute of Environmental Sciences; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Mitacs; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Université du Québec à Montréal; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Round goby; Neogobius; Wetland; Goby; Introduced species; Habitat; Biodiversity; Ecology; Invasive species; Fishery; Environmental science; Biology; Geography; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003848157,0.0001576682,0.0001918302,0.0004361864,0.0004130778,0.0006269583,0.0002193893,0.0002506602,0.001281447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001407447,0.0001106464,0.0001906699,0.0004125361,0.0008889989,0.0003218376,0.0004645366,0.0003394636,0.00005531674],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005525975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008661411,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07144089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2033012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997181,0.00009543597,0.00001110655,0.00005979788,0.00003065484,0.00008490567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988416,0.0003132534,0.0003603551,0.00005266572,0.0001038563,0.000328329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002745059,0.00002262177,0.9977086,0.000004450462,0.00002376156,0.00004925299,0.0001743883,0.0000966919,0.0009553474,0.00004796214,0.0000205315,0.000868918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[3.310159e-7,0.000008926929,0.9995721,9.760826e-7,0.000003304981,0.00001283322,0.0002693766,0.00007688903,0.00002068929,0.00001167338,0.00002186669,9.462483e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997495,0.00002501715,0.00003217318,0.00002061563,3.525857e-7,0.000001548929,0.00001872658,6.525992e-7,0.0001514329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998879,0.00001081666,0.00003301329,0.000005443576,5.755188e-7,0.000001263676,0.00001500698,4.346432e-7,0.00004537899],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07144089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1420501,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03181626220456531,"score_gpt":0.2320709897772294,"score_spread":0.2002547275726641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}