{"id":"W4388270391","doi":"10.1111/csp2.13027","title":"Carrying capacity and cumulative effects management: A case study using bighorn sheep","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Conservation Science and Practice","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kelowna General Hospital; Interior Health; Teck (Canada); WSP (Canada)","funders":"Russian Science Foundation","keywords":"Ovis canadensis; Cumulative effects; Forage; Context (archaeology); Carrying capacity; Environmental resource management; Population; Habitat; Management by objectives; Geography; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003126581,0.00009601864,0.00009011565,0.0001212224,0.001155471,0.0001316325,0.00009033764,0.00003593778,0.00001889136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001359129,0.00009364731,0.00000778814,0.001581608,0.0005809178,0.002246894,0.0002473225,0.00009963825,0.00004116595],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001061078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002790951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001937033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002691088,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986587,0.0002340567,0.0001536377,0.0004009017,0.0003406077,0.0002121517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985436,0.001045397,0.0001191242,0.0001576089,0.00005088927,0.00008334201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004185844,0.00008255801,0.9802899,0.00002533829,0.00002499436,0.0009141405,0.009287457,0.0002012242,0.001437251,0.0008883366,0.0004090108,0.006397901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005262239,0.0001056271,0.934154,0.00001329047,0.00009533504,0.0009592442,0.01746973,0.04440738,0.00004082814,0.0007325554,0.001307623,0.0001881486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954221,0.000007788167,0.000333331,0.00161072,0.0001357969,0.0004898271,6.854856e-7,0.00005207249,0.001947719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966298,0.00001316537,0.001199927,0.002024529,0.00001223366,0.00002632381,5.289964e-7,0.000004587071,0.00008885634],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04613591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8887064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08254758878344502,"score_gpt":0.3428221421601605,"score_spread":0.2602745533767155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}