{"id":"W4388548329","doi":"10.1515/9781552385272-005","title":"“A Case of Special Privilege and Fancied Right”: The Shack Tent Controversy in Prince Albert National Park","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Calgary Press eBooks","topic":"American Environmental and Regional History","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); National park; Law; History; Political science; Art; Art history; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009737421,0.000164872,0.0002431455,0.00003269302,0.0000929328,0.00000127775,0.0002088493,0.0001187313,0.0009113774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002506122,0.0001401162,0.00009371278,0.000005064267,0.003595531,0.00006136163,0.0003723431,0.0001916742,0.00001625873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002136071,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001452677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001352919,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990994,0.00003031346,0.0001537216,0.0002357175,0.0003421147,0.000138747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994347,0.00007867477,0.0002415811,0.0001569551,0.000006773488,0.0000813206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002018896,0.0006859719,0.004847488,0.0002842459,0.0006381266,0.003648426,0.0192733,0.0003677794,0.001643536,0.871272,0.01361288,0.08170733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005847571,0.00005282634,0.002765798,0.00004464875,0.00006746774,0.0001489468,0.0001299227,0.00005802675,0.00004223833,0.0004593455,0.9954181,0.0002278724],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.00569534,0.0001709592,0.00003813308,0.00001372644,0.00005513281,0.0003095701,0.00004374146,0.00000346327,0.9936699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09749061,0.0002512164,0.0003212042,0.00009708206,0.0001211758,8.772488e-7,0.0000146247,0.00002136566,0.9016818],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01115797041085987,"score_gpt":0.1678460234277385,"score_spread":0.1566880530168786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}