{"id":"W4388760497","doi":"10.1108/josm-08-2022-0286","title":"It takes two to tango: a multidisciplinary bibliometric review across six decades of dyadic service encounter research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of service management","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Service (business); Originality; Service quality; Citation; Empirical research; Bibliographic coupling; Service design; Psychology; Multidisciplinary approach; Sociology; Public relations; Service provider; Marketing; Computer science; Epistemology; Business; Qualitative research; Political science; Library science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03262509,0.001226458,0.00583363,0.2156475,0.003731153,0.01423595,0.001590135,0.002315622,0.003542514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1302221,0.00113461,0.003070114,0.2057966,0.002575018,0.01152655,0.005385273,0.00152892,0.0008923022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006847379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02607386,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006391512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0164214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9539263,0.01225394,0.01617563,0.00298346,0.01369298,0.0009676683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8378447,0.09035105,0.02673546,0.00660348,0.03578999,0.002675334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002471046,0.0001578217,0.0478687,0.2973613,0.008013482,0.0008571615,0.01654886,0.0006596097,0.00196755,0.01046192,0.04316902,0.5726874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000146367,0.0005264215,0.1817684,0.3309625,0.01621951,0.001622571,0.03886629,0.001333012,0.001443432,0.009141481,0.4176377,0.0003323234],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.05168736,0.8982031,0.005951378,0.01853638,0.003414612,0.001821557,0.009338011,0.0004059542,0.01064165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3108765,0.6268058,0.03246197,0.008137386,0.003259601,0.006588571,0.009585606,0.000278909,0.002005521],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7843525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1725401,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1788360738484638,"score_gpt":0.5348185486800433,"score_spread":0.3559824748315795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}