{"id":"W4388815816","doi":"10.1002/nme.172","title":"A 2‐D time‐domain boundary element method with damping","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering","topic":"Numerical methods in engineering","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Boundary element method; Benchmark (surveying); Element (criminal law); Boundary (topology); Time domain; Domain (mathematical analysis); Boundary knot method; Method of fundamental solutions; Computer science; Finite element method; Current (fluid); Boundary value problem; Singular boundary method; Structural engineering; Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics; Engineering; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000344917,0.0005165952,0.0006089163,0.0002809407,0.0003215497,0.00059504,0.001230335,0.001468558,0.00568142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006183449,0.0003731615,0.0004072492,0.0002467525,0.000409085,0.0006479856,0.0007756337,0.0007723026,0.001946278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001875376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005092196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008070524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001022155,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998137,0.00005326341,0.000007862739,0.0000217272,0.0000925075,0.00001094657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998391,0.0000555626,0.00001460559,0.00002542486,0.00004853014,0.00001669334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001250016,0.0001528314,0.0005327369,0.0003284689,0.00003742998,0.0001978992,0.0002192593,0.7280946,0.08691646,0.05257212,0.004263279,0.1265598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002222464,0.00002210209,0.00004457806,0.00001202157,0.000003550822,0.00003793816,0.000007568813,0.9875441,0.002982939,0.001487807,0.007828023,0.000007165412],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003303231,0.00005917501,0.9935302,0.0000682862,0.00006323065,0.00003709959,0.00003317373,0.0002727754,0.002632733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1427655,0.0001910236,0.8455709,0.0001280792,0.00003958868,0.0005307969,0.0001733687,0.0002084084,0.01039241],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00568142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01900625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01763780918105991,"score_gpt":0.3679446236914058,"score_spread":0.3503068145103459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}