{"id":"W4388837328","doi":"10.2196/50438","title":"Validating the Safe and Effective Use of a Neurorehabilitation System (InTandem) to Improve Walking in the Chronic Stroke Population: Usability Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies","topic":"Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"EVERSANA (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Neurorehabilitation; Usability; Stroke (engine); Comprehension; Task (project management); Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Population; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Applied psychology; Physical therapy; Medicine; Rehabilitation; Computer science; Human–computer interaction; Engineering; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02323431,0.0009282381,0.0008370592,0.0008599189,0.0005812639,0.0008593246,0.001001279,0.0009945717,0.0007273569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03264223,0.0004407523,0.001123085,0.0004428637,0.0007082317,0.0009238,0.001246443,0.0005080345,0.0002304245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006220052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001094075,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001064028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002357288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9878181,0.007915461,0.00133965,0.0008969143,0.001565465,0.000464375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751129,0.01479963,0.001750906,0.002372497,0.005349933,0.0006141281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.006434093,0.05011975,0.4480303,0.003783155,0.001658495,0.001266542,0.07488056,0.005557967,0.05134678,0.0004420955,0.002508583,0.3539717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001904933,0.1888847,0.7266502,0.0008415396,0.00110301,0.001572926,0.01900664,0.01905156,0.03115847,0.0003036294,0.009208984,0.0003132338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997052,0.00004108052,0.001820508,0.00002254288,0.000006496958,0.0007070038,0.00005261193,0.00002421715,0.0002735612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803232,0.0001335643,0.0168535,0.0001030566,0.00001798428,0.001889264,0.0002560902,0.00002185461,0.0004015895],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02323431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1228762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01984985576092058,"score_gpt":0.3159209262846018,"score_spread":0.2960710705236813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}