{"id":"W4389037124","doi":"10.1111/geoj.12559","title":"The Anthropocene Obscene: Poetic inquiry and evocative evidence of inequality","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geographical Journal","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Anthropocene; Reflexivity; Privilege (computing); Sociology; Politics; Poetry; Power (physics); Vulnerability (computing); Inequality; Representation (politics); Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Social science; Political science; Literature; Art; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005691234,0.00009057626,0.0001288775,0.00007146375,0.0006955187,0.000191503,0.0001469948,0.00003660566,0.000194355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001094464,0.00005397059,0.00007874326,0.0001017821,0.00150773,0.000202872,0.00007532496,0.000312969,0.00001027291],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006215587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009587295,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001779152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001862849,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990432,0.0001210147,0.0002680192,0.0001126745,0.0002336715,0.0002214453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992925,0.0003525061,0.00008289716,0.0001245704,0.0000543169,0.0000932029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005557418,0.0004505927,0.2146455,0.000502324,0.00045381,0.0001952583,0.1294086,0.00002197778,0.001330847,0.5694847,0.02617702,0.0567737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008929212,0.0009775977,0.7608593,0.001077977,0.0001359569,0.0001766825,0.03931629,0.0001464648,0.0002580915,0.1409728,0.05465929,0.0005265624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867595,0.007303329,0.00001513271,0.004187199,0.000652537,0.00006886321,0.00002203253,0.0000236222,0.0009678175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994482,0.004807245,0.00001582093,0.0001868263,0.00038855,0.000002889838,0.000002430944,0.00000676793,0.0001074954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5462138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5555295,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06005364868101559,"score_gpt":0.2981269038414301,"score_spread":0.2380732551604146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}