{"id":"W4389117060","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128163","title":"Quantifying carbon stocks and functional diversity of roadside ecosystems – A case study in Quebec, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Urban forestry & urban greening","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Chicoutimi; Université Laval","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"Understory; Ecosystem; Environmental science; Species richness; Vegetation (pathology); Biomass (ecology); Forest ecology; Ecology; Carbon sequestration; Terrestrial ecosystem; Forestry; Agroforestry; Geography; Biology; Canopy; Carbon dioxide","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002787181,0.000290123,0.0001973631,0.001289931,0.001560588,0.0009059284,0.0005891942,0.0002602102,0.001303161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005986534,0.0001122296,0.0002372929,0.002994199,0.000451948,0.0003088306,0.0003478295,0.0002083474,0.00009709735],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01844735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008797086,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998223,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997868,0.00002456671,0.000007678101,0.00004517286,0.00005182513,0.00008402619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994082,0.00007873178,0.00007149125,0.00002179163,0.0003212962,0.00009847284],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007769652,0.00007701061,0.9687008,0.00007409556,0.00009186407,0.0008036085,0.001646547,0.003217526,0.001841184,0.00050281,0.0009765808,0.02199028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005425843,0.0000253631,0.9908289,0.000028855,0.00002580706,0.0001075125,0.002686215,0.004103933,0.0003042603,0.00004850148,0.00182021,0.0000151271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966719,0.0002306822,0.0001962089,0.00004463934,0.000001173928,0.000023876,0.001117344,0.00000735773,0.001706762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978203,0.0001560392,0.0004520277,0.00001621986,0.000001002965,0.00000855259,0.0005932361,0.000002324073,0.0009503816],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01844735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1338455,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02808661624672248,"score_gpt":0.2258415075496183,"score_spread":0.1977548913028958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}