{"id":"W4389335555","doi":"10.1103/physrevphyseducres.19.020164","title":"Confirmatory factor analysis of two self-efficacy scales for astronomy understanding and robotic telescope use","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review Physics Education Research","topic":"Career Development and Diversity","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Confirmatory factor analysis; Attribution; License; Scale (ratio); Self-efficacy; Construct validity; Construct (python library); Psychology; Subject (documents); Telescope; Citation; Astronomy; Computer science; Physics; Library science; Structural equation modeling; Psychometrics; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01672899,0.0006595879,0.0005535845,0.001683661,0.0009498527,0.0009321683,0.0004925221,0.0004901502,0.002003534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03604152,0.0003055458,0.001397999,0.001220546,0.000938559,0.0006043205,0.0009654633,0.001171411,0.0003474839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004485334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002110512,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003960966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004504805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9941478,0.002967041,0.000424152,0.0005906315,0.001558415,0.0003119652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9574051,0.02524104,0.002866392,0.003482547,0.009957878,0.001047004],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000379492,0.0009070365,0.9385172,0.0001116004,0.0003263551,0.0001055787,0.006860295,0.0009056579,0.002605556,0.001895415,0.001210477,0.04617547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009955242,0.0007550101,0.9857849,0.00005136816,0.0001186417,0.00009332092,0.004204088,0.00443067,0.001767981,0.0009231003,0.001730561,0.00004070358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906552,0.00005234314,0.006309987,0.0001248079,0.00004099763,0.0004662171,0.0002950951,0.00004582663,0.002009504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945177,0.00002767676,0.003969783,0.0000225514,0.00001015601,0.0005583687,0.0004819758,0.00001074308,0.0004009569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01672899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08847243,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3124720375094777,"score_gpt":0.4984038029206714,"score_spread":0.1859317654111937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}