{"id":"W4389452749","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12707","title":"Canadian politicians' rhetoric on Twitter/X: Analysing prejudice and inclusion towards Muslims using structural topic modelling and rhetorical analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Mitacs; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Rhetoric; Populism; Prejudice (legal term); Rhetorical question; Sociology; Multiculturalism; Politics; Ideology; Solidarity; Social media; Social psychology; Media studies; Gender studies; Political science; Psychology; Law; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001588789,0.0001084563,0.0004389508,0.0008713113,0.002552432,0.0001353925,0.0001799185,0.000164864,0.00005307498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001501261,0.0001259353,0.0002025745,0.001877904,0.00018643,0.0001546989,0.0001410124,0.0002985532,7.688024e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003001357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002285172,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1014188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03777593,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978604,0.0005968477,0.0004283796,0.000241069,0.0004803959,0.0003929416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989852,0.0001771347,0.0002412516,0.00004968388,0.0002469954,0.0002997769],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001345094,0.0001364045,0.06011711,0.00004956816,0.004190431,0.001424651,0.1670943,0.03394093,0.0003376119,0.01501276,0.0008111104,0.7167506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001881908,0.0002569197,0.6933441,0.0001471212,0.00302526,0.0003620127,0.0131776,0.09739889,0.000007126083,0.1831582,0.006250687,0.0009901429],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900846,0.0003880078,0.004951552,0.003014489,0.0003828306,0.00004851641,0.000007135,0.00001400704,0.001108795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967929,0.0002507754,0.001576616,0.0004995559,0.0007994849,4.915939e-7,0.000004947346,0.000008967182,0.00006622405],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7157605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987461,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09448230342171532,"score_gpt":0.4291919257504752,"score_spread":0.3347096223287599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}