{"id":"W4389452749","doi":"10.1111/bjso.12707","title":"Canadian politicians' rhetoric on Twitter/X: Analysing prejudice and inclusion towards Muslims using structural topic modelling and rhetorical analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Social Psychology","topic":"Computational and Text Analysis Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Mitacs; UK Research and Innovation","keywords":"Rhetoric; Populism; Prejudice (legal term); Rhetorical question; Sociology; Multiculturalism; Politics; Ideology; Solidarity; Social media; Social psychology; Media studies; Gender studies; Political science; Psychology; Law; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002609015,0.0004602232,0.0004056113,0.005596428,0.004610041,0.003636066,0.0006886155,0.0007390607,0.002148269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01037323,0.0002350049,0.0003316913,0.006341956,0.00229757,0.001294774,0.001321909,0.0009894548,0.0004371481],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02027841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02087817,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8748607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9143884,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983466,0.0003688478,0.00006171844,0.000196766,0.0007174985,0.0003084846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907381,0.005570324,0.0008853278,0.0002096916,0.002239039,0.000357598],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007352175,0.0001712237,0.265529,0.002097731,0.0001205101,0.001130703,0.5456124,0.002633082,0.01140353,0.02127002,0.02556652,0.1237301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004740229,0.00009682099,0.485931,0.0006799399,0.0002018862,0.0002399125,0.3291734,0.01823995,0.005685411,0.003702559,0.1557473,0.0002545066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676193,0.000734966,0.002414745,0.002128196,0.00007055952,0.0002604611,0.006397893,0.00009827182,0.02027545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868957,0.000496429,0.003694768,0.0002469255,0.00004615853,0.0002436513,0.003212866,0.00004761813,0.005115908],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1251393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2517525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09448230342171532,"score_gpt":0.4291919257504752,"score_spread":0.3347096223287599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}