{"id":"W4389547141","doi":"10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2023.111893","title":"Augmented reality for food quality assessment: Bridging the physical and digital worlds","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Food Engineering","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Traceability; Augmented reality; Food safety; Quality (philosophy); Workflow; Food industry; Food quality; Food packaging; Transformative learning; Quality assurance; Computer science; Process management; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Engineering; Marketing; Computer security; Human–computer interaction; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002589852,0.001200561,0.001057556,0.002874631,0.0005543803,0.004186128,0.001248554,0.002683044,0.004038045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004730185,0.0005371719,0.001567439,0.001947209,0.001914555,0.004530462,0.002816782,0.001784869,0.0008407099],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009072743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00120944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002345711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002243531,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968405,0.001257214,0.0001744735,0.0003851007,0.001223146,0.0001196247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961573,0.002397783,0.0002804036,0.0002360306,0.0008501699,0.0000783768],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001779276,0.0000750684,0.002021563,0.0121408,0.0002524522,0.0004303523,0.001496316,0.002590511,0.01414818,0.03442498,0.01134509,0.9208968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007751958,0.000793789,0.01202831,0.01397841,0.0007486523,0.005599566,0.003153148,0.009185928,0.02212308,0.04855622,0.8832607,0.000494693],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01546491,0.7986665,0.1317009,0.008565159,0.001717299,0.0001911326,0.0004279101,0.0007772523,0.04248886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2107226,0.6454774,0.129853,0.004338736,0.001380125,0.0003077841,0.0005711992,0.0001553268,0.007193781],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004186128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01369661,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05563770697240428,"score_gpt":0.3010254276244856,"score_spread":0.2453877206520814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}