{"id":"W4389555353","doi":"10.58992/rcdp.i67.2023.4077","title":"The Quebec Secession Reference and the federal Clarity Act: the fascination with clarity and the value of ambiguity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Catalana de Dret Públic","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Journal of Communication (Canada); Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Generalitat de Catalunya; Universitat Pompeu Fabra","keywords":"Secession; CLARITY; Political science; Supreme court; Law; Politics; Ambiguity; Referendum; Federalism; Context (archaeology); Sociology; History","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005135228,0.0001020612,0.0002076616,0.00001183972,0.001781091,0.0005018669,0.0004148127,0.00008850151,0.000003600631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001063865,0.00003745505,0.00004585383,0.0003572338,0.002028093,0.0001433793,0.0001103152,0.0003151542,0.000002928278],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008514903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002207652,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2506289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1057894,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976956,0.001110697,0.000215606,0.000183688,0.000479065,0.000315349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979341,0.001360226,0.0002059383,0.0003362843,0.00008777089,0.00007565637],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006496659,0.000006260666,0.008699157,0.00003791002,0.00001529254,7.87385e-7,0.003535698,4.505427e-7,0.000009526169,0.98419,0.0008280468,0.002611838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001052798,0.00002199883,0.8424709,0.0001320867,0.00004559373,0.000005576408,0.002287896,0.0005603972,0.00001444243,0.01597264,0.1373096,0.0001261536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532242,0.001404642,0.00004288426,0.04069511,0.00005019074,0.0006361136,0.00004252343,0.00003331289,0.003871053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968005,0.001089091,0.000002634563,0.0003018916,0.00009252507,0.00002875232,0.000006632416,0.000005386532,0.001672623],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9682174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995185,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01584151677660201,"score_gpt":0.2897372544019782,"score_spread":0.2738957376253762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}